Comments on: Everything is Open Source, actually

By: zoid

zoid — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:39:32 +0000

awwww… the software removed my angle backets;
Given that x>y [=] x is nicer then y.

Replace square brackets by angle brackets :)

By: zoid

zoid — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:29:34 +0000

@protest: no, Bob>Ross, because he does not claim to be able to code (but Ross does). Given that x>y x is nicer then y.

By: sasayins

sasayins — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:29:33 +0000

protest,

i think Ross and Bob are same, same idiots.. :)

By: ronald

ronald — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:53:12 +0000

boris is hectic….

By: protest

protest — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:49:48 +0000

Boris>Randy>Ted>Ross>Bob

By: Wayne

Wayne — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:48:15 +0000

Woah :)

By: sasayins

sasayins — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:41:58 +0000

WTH!! boris is god-like!

By: zoid

zoid — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:25:21 +0000

Nice one. It remindes me of Mel: http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/story-of-mel.html
However, I claim that no matter how much of a Ãœberhacker you are, no serious project these days can be maintained if its basically one large number (thats exactly what machine code is).
GHC just insanely kicks ass … both do, actually ;)

By: Rasmus

Rasmus — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:00:25 +0000

Our reverse engineers wouldn’t quite agree that all machine code looks the same … they see some pretty obscure stuff. :-)

By: Dharivs

Dharivs — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:19:57 +0000

@Tyruiop: because hackers need relax too ;)